Essay

Government VS Corporation Control

Daniel Lin

English 20

1984 is a dystopian fiction novel written by George Orwell with the purpose of warning readers of the dangers of a totalitarian government. The book itself was written and published in 1949 and portrays the perfect totalitarian society, a government with absolute power. The purpose of the books name was to tell its readers in 1949 that the story could very much become reality in the near future if totalitarianism was not opposed, the title suggested that the world in the novel could really be a possibility in 35 years. In 1984 Orwell portrays a state in which the government monitors and controls every aspect of human life. The Party is able to have complete control over its people using psychological manipulation, physical control, and technology in unimaginable ways to make the people work for the good of the Party. Much like 1984, Oryx and Crake written by Margaret Atwood is also a dystopian fiction. Its setting is also futuristic relative to the time it was written and warns readers that valuing science over human morals will bring about our own destruction. It is a place where society and life inside compounds happen under the watchful eyes of different corporations and life outside these compounds are left to rot. Within these compounds, people have individual freedom as long as their actions do not clash with the interests of the corporations, but as seen in the book, any actions against the corporation would be subject to execution. These corporations control people by placing them in the compounds with very tight security while using technology to spy on these residents to make sure they are not opposing the corporations in any way. In 1984 the government monitors controls life using psychological and physical manipulation along with technology while in Oryx and Crake, the corporations control its residents with technology and physical force to a lesser extent but do not manipulate them psychologically.

In 1984, the Party barrages its subjects with psychological stimuli that overwhelm the brain’s capacity for independent thought. Giant telescreens in every citizen’s room provides them with a constant stream of propaganda that is designed to make the failures of the Party appear to be triumphant successes. These telescreens also monitor behavior of the people wherever they go, and are continuously reminded of this by omnipresent signs that read “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU,” (Orwell, 3). Big Brother is an illusion created by the Party to represent the Party, these signs communicate to the people that the Party is always watching your every move, and thus creating fear in the minds of the people to make sure that they do not question the Party’s authority. The Party also undermines family structure by bringing children into an organization call the Junior Spies, which brainwashes these children and encourages them to spy on their parents and report any signs of disloyalty to the Party. Another thing that the Party uses to psychologically manipulate its citizens is that they use propaganda channel the people’s pent-up frustration and emotion into ferocious displays of hatred toward the Party’s political enemies, and many of these enemies are created by the Party solely for this purpose. The Party also controls every source of information; they manage and rewrite the content of all newspapers and histories for its own ends. Individuals are prohibited to keep records of their past such as photographs or documents. As a result, the memories of these people become fuzzy and unreliable, and they become perfectly willing to believe whatever the Party tells them. By controlling the present, the Party is able to manipulate the past, and in controlling the past, they can justify all actions in the present. The totalitarian government in this novel is able to easily manipulate and control its people using such means and bend them to their will.

In addition to psychological manipulation, the Party also controls the people physically. The Party constantly watches them for any sign of disloyalty; even a small facial twitch could lead to an arrest. Members of the Party are forced to undergo mass morning exercises called Physical Jerks, and then to work long, grueling days at government agencies, keeping them in a constant state of exhaustion. Anyone who manages to defy the Party is punished and reeducated through torture, and after being exposed to weeks of this intense treatment, Winston himself comes to the conclusion that nothing is more powerful than physical pain, not even emotional loyalty or moral conviction can overcome it. And after subjected to such treatment, he finally breaks and writes down “TWO AND TWO MAKE FIVE.” (Orwell, 290) The Party is able to control reality by conditioning the minds of their victims with physical torture and is able to convince its subjects that two and two does indeed make five.

Along with psychological and physical manipulation, the Party also uses technology to monitor life while enforcing these manipulations. By placing telescreens and hidden microphones across the city, the Party is able to monitor the behavior of its people at all times. In addition, the Party employs complex mechanisms to exert large-scale control on the economy and sources of information as well as fearsome machinery to inflict torture upon its enemies. People that show any signs of resentment could lead to a punishable offense, as Winston notices, “It was terribly dangerous to let your thought wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen.” (Orwell, 65) The smallest things in front of these telesreens could give you away, a nervous tick, a habit of muttering to yourself, the look of anxiety, even having a improper expression on the face was a punishable offense. Using technology with such means, the Party is able to monitor its citizens and punish and reeducate anyone that does anything against their interest and constantly bend them to the Party’s will.

In Oryx and Crake however, there are no signs of psychological manipulation or control. People remain free to think and do for themselves and there is no constant oppression from the corporations. Throughout the novel, there are no instances in Jimmy’s memory where there was any psychological manipulation or control; he was able to live a normal life with a normal family. He had a normal life despite the fact that his father and mother ignored him most of the time. The corporations simply did not need to psychologically control its residents because they would not oppose them in any way, so the corporations felt that physically securing them in compounds and spying on them using different forms of technology would be enough.

The corporations that control the compounds place incredible security around the compound so that its residents were basically forced to stay inside the compounds and impossible exit the compound without authorization documents. In addition, the corporations have set up a private police called the CorpSeCorps; these people monitor and control everything that goes on inside these compounds. They have an interest in protecting the company’s assets and spying on their employees to make sure they do not go against the corporation. The CorpSeCrops carefully monitor and record all acts of leaving and entering the compound. For example, after the disappearance of Jimmy’s mother, the CorpSeCorps would immediately come to Jimmy’s house and ask Jimmy questions like “You think she had a boyfriend? Did she go to the pleeblands much?” (Atwood, 64) to be able to get clues as to where his mother was hiding so they could get a hold of her and what she knows before someone else does. Having tight border security, the corporations would be able to keep its residents inside the compound and have them continuously work for the interests of the company.

There is also lots of advanced technology in Oryx and Crake, advanced technology in the medical field allows them to genetically modify animals to grow organs that can be transplanted into humans, and creating medicine that cures diseases. As Crake explains to Jimmy, medicine which is actually implanted with viruses that could only be cured with the next release of medicine, and the next batch of the medicine would be implanted with a new virus which will need another batch of medicine thus creating an infinite loop that enslaves the employees of the corporations to always need to buy more of its products. In addition to medicine, the corporations also use hidden cameras and other similar bots so the CorpSeCorps can spy on the residents of these compounds. Knowing this, when she explains to Jimmy what disease was, she fakes the excuse of taking a walk out side “hauled Jimmy up by one wrist, closed the back door with exaggerated care behind them. She didn’t even put their coats on. No coats, no hats. She was dressed in her dressing gown and slippers.” (Atwood, 20) to make sure there was a lesser chance of being listened to by the CorpSeCorps. Using such technology, the corporations would be able to monitor its residents at all times and bend them to their will.

Although the novels written by Margaret Atwood and George Orwell are both dystopian fictions with the same basic themes, there are still some noticeable differences. In 1984, the Party used psychological manipulation, physical control, and technology to monitor and control the lives of its subjects so that they will work for the interest of the Party. In Oryx and Crake, the corporations also used physical control and technology but to a lesser extent to monitor and control life inside the compounds, while not using psychological manipulation to control its residents.

Works Cited

Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake: a novel. Vintage Canada ed. Toronto: Vintage Canada, 20092003. Print.

Orwell, George. Nineteen eighty-four . London [etc.: Penguin Books, 2008. Print.

Williams, Raymond. "Ninteen Eighty Four in 1984." Marxism Today 12 Jan. 1984: 12 - 16. Print.

cards, the introduction of ID, and we will root. "1984: For the love of Big Brother." Philip Coppens.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Dec. 2010. <http://www.philipcoppens.com/1984.html>.

Crucible Assignment - Webs

Crucible Assignment

The Crucible

Act I

The first act begins with Reverend Parris praying over his daughter, Betty's, bed. From a conversation with Abigail, Parris learns and suspects that Abigail, Betty, and numerous other girls were involved with occult activities in the forest. Parris is frightened at this this thought thinking that this occurrence could be used against him and destroy his reputation. Later, John Hale arrives at Parris's house upon being sent for to take a look at Betty. John Hale, being an expert in the supernatural, questions Abigail on what exactly happened in the woods, Abigail immediately accuses Tituba (a slave from Barbados) of leading the ritual and making her drink chicken blood. Tituba being frightened, confesses her sins and accuses numerous others of committing witchcraft to save herself, seeing this, Abigail does the same to clear herself of all suspicion, and Betty miraculously goes into a trance and gives out numerous other names and stating that they were with the devil, "I saw Alice Barrow with the Devil!" (Miller, 48) "I saw Goody Bibber with the Devil!" (Miller, 48).

During the 1950s, US Senator Joseph McCarthy claimed that the state department was infiltrated by Communists. This ideology eventually developed into McCarthyism, McCarthyism is basically accusations of disloyalty, or treason without any regard for evidence, which is exactly what this is. In the 1950s they hunted Communists, in the 1600s they hunted witches, they are basically the same thing. In the play, so far only Abby, Tituba and Betty have accused others of siding with the devil with absolutely no evidence what so ever, throughout the play, there will be a lot more of these false accusations with absolutely no proof.


Act II

The second act follows the first act with an eight days time leap. It starts at the Proctor's house, John Proctor has just come home from planting and learns from his wife, Elizabeth that Marry Warren, the Proctor's servant, has gone to town to testify in court after he strictly told her not to leave the house and is enraged when he finds out and threatens to whip her. When Marry Warren comes back, she hands Goody Proctor (Elizabeth) a small ragged doll claiming it being a gift and as a threat, says, "We must all love each other now, Goody Proctor." (Miller, 56) John and Goody Proctor learns from Marry Warren that 39 people have been accused and arrested for witchcraft and that Goody Osburn has been sentenced to hang. They are shocked, and even more so when they learn that Elizabeth has been accused as well, but Marry Warren told her that the court dismissed it after Marry Warren denied seeing Elizabeth of committing witchcraft. After a while, John Hale comes to the house and sees if John Proctor knows all his commandments, John recalls all of them except for Adultery. In the middle of their conversation, Giles comes in and interrupts that Giles's wife as well as Rebecca Nurse have also been arrested, this shocks everyone in the room. A little while later, Ezekiel Cheever comes in stating that he has an arrest warrant for Elizabeth, and says that Abigail has been stabbed by a needle in the stomach and she claims that it was Elizabeth's spirit that did so. His suspicions are confirmed when he sees the poppet with a needle stuck in it and takes Elizabeth away.

In the past, men held all of the power of the household, women (the wife) had very little control of what went on much less the slaves and servants. In the second act, we see the irony that all the decisive power in Salem has been transferred to the girls like Abby and Marry Warren. From a logical standpoint, it would be crazy for a servant to threaten the man or woman of the household and to accuse someone of higher status. This was all made possible by the belief of witchcraft and Satan, in reality, it is the church that has doomed people to think this way.


Act III

The Third act begins in the court room, a case is presented to the court that the girls are fraud and are what they say to be. This is followed by a signed petition which is presented by John Proctor. Giles claims that he has a witness, but is unwilling to reveal the witness to protect him from being arrested, and as a result gets himself arrested for contempt of the court. Abigail and the girls lie and say that the statement is false. John Proctor finally snaps and confesses his relationship with Abigail. Elizabeth is called to the court to confirm John's confession, not knowing that John has confessed, she says no to protect her husbands name. Seeing that things are going bad, Abigail and the girls pretend that Marry Warren has bewitched them and causes her to panic, in the end, Marry Warren gives up and says that John Proctor is the Devils man and that he is the one that threatened her to turn against the other girls, this gets John Proctor arrested.

Here, we know for that the relationship between Elizabeth and John Proctor has much since improved compared to the beginning. Before, she would occasionally remind John of his sin, but now, when she is asked that is John a lecher, she replies, "No, sir." (Miller, 113) After that, we know that she has forgiven John Proctor and no longer blames him from her attempt to protect his name in court.


Act IV

The last act starts in prison where everyone who has not yet been executed are waiting to hang. Hale is disgusted by the courts decision and tries to convince Elizabeth to tell John Proctor to lie to save himself. After Elizabeth and John have talked, John says that he has decided to confess, he signs the paper and snatches it before it could be stowed away and claims, "I confess to God, God has seen my name on this! It is enough!" (Miller, 142) Without hard evidence, the court cannot pardon John, although he knows this, he chose the right thing to do, and that is to not lie even if he hangs for it.

The Crucible has the elements of a Parable, teaching a morale lesson with a short story. In the last moments of the decision between life and death, he chooses to keep his name given by God and not lie even if it might save his life. The moral would most likely be that even if we make mistakes throughout our lives, we can cleanse and purify ourselves by making what was wrong, right, and that is exactly what John Proctor did, although he lost his life, he chose to not lie in the presence of god and made right what was wrong.

Vocab Web

Pleasantville Analysis

Pleasantville – A World of Colour

Daniel Lin

English 20

We live in a world filled with vibrant colours, to us, these colours have great symbolic meaning, strong and vibrant colours like red for love, and soft, mellow colours like blue for peace. In such a world, colour already has such importance, but it would be much more significant if colour were to be introduced into a monochrome society. In his film Pleasantville, director Gary Ross uses colour to bring a repetitive, boring, and monochrome world to life. Colour already has great meaning in our society, but it is still not enough for Gary Ross, for him, it means much more. For him, as presented by the film, colour symbolizes change, emotion, and segregation, while connecting to religious imagery. It is evident that colour is the most critical component of the film Pleasantville, without colour, that world would remain as it always was.

            The film starts off in our world. Two very unlikely siblings fighting over a mystical remote that transports them into a 1950s TV show that is in fact a utopian society, a place called Pleasantville. In this alternate reality, everything is monochrome; there is only black, white, and grayscale. As the name suggests, Pleasantville is a perfect place, or so it seems. Everything has a natural flow and order that has to be followed, as soon as someone or something disrupts this flow, change occurs, and change for a static utopian society, can very quickly become a dystopia if no action were to be taken, and that would prove to be true after a series of events.

Shown near the beginning of the film, Budd Parker (the protagonist), finds out that no matter how you throw or kick a basketball in any direction, it will always end up in the basket one way or another. After a while, Budd tells Bill Johnson (the soda shop owner) that not everything has to be done in order, and to switch things up a bit once in a while. That was the straw that broke the camels back, switching things up destroyed the natural flow of Pleasantville, and marked beginning of the change that would happen in Pleasantville that would bring unrest and chaos (black and white objects and people becoming coloured). It created problems for the people of Pleasantville, a problem called change, and without ever knowing of such a thing, everything spun out of control.

            Other than change, colour, especially red, also represents emotion. For the people of Pleasantville red symbolizes love, pleasure, curiosity, anger, and destruction. The first thing to turn coloured was a blood red rose, and a rose, as we understand, is a symbol of love. It is a flower we present to people that are held deepest in our hearts. Red also represents pleasure, when Budd’s mother was pleasuring herself in the bathtub, the tree outside their house burst into violent flames. In the Holy Bible, Eve’s sin was her curiosity causing her to pick the apple from a tree in the Garden of Eden for knowledge. As punishment, she and Adam were cast away from the utopia created by god, a place called Eden. In the film, Budd’s girlfriend picks a crimson apple from a tree and gives it to him to eat. This symbolizes that, in return for knowledge, the place called Pleasantville can no longer be accessed, and that there is no turning back. Before things started to change, all the books in Pleasantville were blank, but now, they are filling themselves in. This results in the anger of the people that want Pleasantville to return to the way it always was, and causes them to burn all the books in the public library in raging flames, and this time, instead of a black and white fire like one would expect, the flames were a violent shade of red.

            Colour also establishes segregation, it creates a line of separation between the “unchanged” and the “changed” people of Pleasantville, the contrast of putting a coloured person beside a black and white person will cause the viewers eyes to instantly recognize how different they are. Big Bob, Pleasantville’s mayor states, “Up until now everything around here has been, well, pleasant. Recently certain things have become unpleasant. Now, it seems to me that the first thing we have to do is to separate out the things that are unpleasant from the things that are pleasant.” (Pleasantville) and a short while after, during the trial of Budd Parker and Bill Johnson (for painting something in colour on the wall of the police station after it was banned), you instantly see that the black and white people are sitting in the courtroom on the bottom floor while the “coloured” people are packed and standing on the balcony. This is direct evidence of segregation by separating the two groups of people, coloured and non-coloured.

            For most people, colour already has a lot of meaning, but it is different for Director Gary Ross. As shown in the film Pleasantville, colour means much more than we would think of, it represents change, emotions such as love, pleasure, curiosity, anger, destruction, segregation, and connects to religion. It is made evident by the events of this film that colour is the film’s main highlight. It is the most noticeable element of this film. It symbolized the change of a boring, monochrome town into a lively and vibrant society.

Works Cited

Pleasantville (New Line Platinum Series). Dir. Gary Ross. Perf. Tobey Maguire, Jeff Daniels, Joan Allen. New Line Home Video, 1998. DVD.

Oryx and Crake Question 2

1. Oryx and Crake includes many details that seem futuristic, but are in fact already apparent in our world. What parallels were you able to draw between the items in the world of the novel and those in your own?


Snowman is one of the last human survivors in a post apocalyptic world, living alone in a tree but not far from others. He spends most of his time reflecting on his life before the apocalypse, when he was called by a different name, the name Jimmy. He examined the values of life, ideals and morales versus reality and science. Ever so often, the "Children of Crake", genetically modified human beings that are seemingly perfect, seeks the Snowman for knowledge of the past they had never known (the pre apocalyptic world). These beautiful and innocent children know nothing of the world they live in and how evil it truly is, it is as if there are flitters put in their eyes so that they could only see the good. They are like new borns, innocent, pure, knowing nothing about the world they have been brought into but curious none-the-less, or what their future will be like, or even if they will have a future at all.

http://blog.bioethics.net/baby

This picture shows a new born baby with its eyes filled with curiosity, it does not know anything of this world, remaining innocent and pure.

Socratic Seminar 2

The author seems to stress about the fact that science itself is just knowledge, and therefore, morally neutral. The application of that knowledge is what should be considered good or bad, not science itself. Science is knowledge, and knowledge can only "be", it cannot have an intention, how ever, people see it to be evil along with the scientists that seek this knowledge. It is understandable how people view it to be evil, after all it was science that lead to the creation of weapons of mass destruction. However, it is also science that has provided use with everyday utilities, the light bulb, cars, television sets, phones, etc. Scientists are the pursuers of knowledge, while others seek the application of that knowledge. For example, if a scientist says, "we have discovered an element that could possible lead to the cure of cancer." The people world wide would be only interested in the idea, not the idea itself. Scientists are there to make discoveries, not to say, "If you have a problem, we can solve it for you." I was quite shocked on how much I agreed with the author, if people could come to understand his views (of which I think is great), they would be able to stop blaming scientists if their discoveries went wrong and instead, the people that used it for evil. For example, shortly after the theory of the adam was theorized, the adam bomb was built and used to level many lives during the Second World War. The blame? It was directed at the people who discovered the adam, not the ones who used the bomb for their own profit. Scientists are like little children, discovering knew things is like a child opening a present on Christmas Day.

What is more important, science or moral?

Does science benefit or degrade humanity as a whole?

Could science and moral work together? If so, why?

Oryx and Crake Question

5. If you had the chance to fabricate an improved human being, would you do it? If so, what features would you choose to incorporate? Why would these be better than what we've got? Your model must of course be biologically viable.


If i had the chance to fabricate an improved human being, I would definitely not let such an opportunity pass. With medical at its peak, and advancing nano technology, the "perfect man", would not be impossible to create. Legality is the only wall between us and the "perfect man". If it were to be legal I would definitely improve a human being. First of all, I would add genes that allow faster regeneration, or healing if you will, of organs, tissues, and bones. I would keep the appearance of a normal human being, but adding genes that would improve physic, for example, the genes of a cheetah for speed and agility, the genes of a tiger for strength, and the genes of a deer for sharp senses. I would also genetically modify this persons immune system and make it stronger so that they would not be able to attract known diseases such as, leukaemia, types of cancer, etc. However, I would leave the brain alone, the brain itself is a mystery to us, and to play around with something so powerful and dangerous seems to be unwise. This would be much better than what we have right now because factors that would normally claim our lives would be greatly reduced. Disease and global pandemics would no longer be a problem. Sharp senses, speed, and strength would be able to protect us from people that bear ill will. Improved organ and tissue regeneration would allow people to visit hospitals less so the emergency rooms would not the crowded, and it could even possibly be able to prolong life spans. The possibilities are endless.


http://www.the-eleventh.com/files/hires_human.jpg


As you can see, there are no signs of any physical abnormalities. Unlike what many people think a modified human should look like (usually some kind of beast like figure), this man looks just like any other human being despite having genetic modifications.

Wordle

<a href="http://www.wordle.net/show/wrdl/2569284/jlseixhjdlgggga201840235u" 
          title="Wordle: jlseixhjdlgggga201840235u"><img
          src="http://www.wordle.net/thumb/wrdl/2569284/jlseixhjdlgggga201840235u"
          alt="Wordle: jlseixhjdlgggga201840235u"
          style="padding:4px;border:1px solid #ddd"></a>

Billy Budd questions 4

2. How is the burial of Claggart ironic?  What feelings and ideas does this burial conjure for you, the reader?

            The irony of Claggart’s burial is that he, the evil one, had a proper and formal burial at sea, while Billy, the kind and innocent one, is to be hanged for his crime. Claggart, someone who has never done anything good in his life, receives such respect in his death, while Billy receives absolutely nothing. It is as if Claggart will laugh at Billy’s misfortune in his grave and saying, “I got my way after all Billy.” This gives the reader a sense of injustice and makes the reader despise the past society as a whole for its unjust actions.

http://www.halloweenmania.co.uk/images/laughing-skullhead.gif

A picture of a skull laughing, this represents that even in death, Claggart laughs at Billy’s misfortune.

4. What is the significance of Billy’s last words?  How does it connect to themes and symbolism in the text? 

In Billy’s last words, “God bless Captain Vere!” is ironic because he is so innocent and oblivious that even if Captain Vere was basically the cause of his sentence, he still has complete respect and trust for his captain. He does not realize that Captain Vere was the man who drove the court to Billy’s sentence, and of course does not blame his captain one single bit. He is thankful for Captain Vere's hospitality during the time he was on the Bellipotent, and is forever loyal and trusting towards his captain.

http://ihasahotdog.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/funny-dog-pictures-loyalty-forever.jpg?w=492&h=442

A picture of a dog that is forever loyal to its owner.

Socratic Seminar

The importance of this passage seems to be on the topic of “self respect”. This term can be defined in numerous ways, but I would never have expected the author to define it as something so deep rooted. “Self respect” to most people can be seen as pride, but for the author, it is something much than that, it is something that is rooted in humanity itself and defines who we are. Although I cannot see this having connections to any “big ideas” so far, it could be brought to attention as a new concept of philosophy and could make pretty large impacts if taken into further studies, but the only thing is that I cannot tell if the impacts from this “idea” will be beneficial or not. In this reading, the one thing I do not understand is the concept of “alienation from self”, first of all, how are the examples provided alienation from self? For example, “we no longer answer the telephone, because someone might want something;” I cannot see it as alienation from self but rather alienation from others. I like how this passage starts our, but as it nears the end, it wavers from its original point. In the beginning, the author talks about how it is centered on the “self”, but as it gets near the end, the author starts using “self respect” as an offensive maneuver against others, and turns it into a “battle strategy”. From life experiences, we tend to raise ourselves above others to make it seem like “we” are the best, and “they” are not, this would be one example in a real life situation.

Questions:

1.    Why does the author start in one direction and suddenly write off into a different direction?

2.    How is “self respect” connected to “alienation from self”?

3.    Is “self respect” courage?

Billy Budd Comments

Billy Budd questions 3

5. What is the tragedy of Chapter 19?  Do you sympathize with Billy Budd?  Why or why not?

            The tragedy of Chapter 19 is the fact that Claggart goes to Vere and accuses Billy of mutiny, Billy was given the chance to speak in his own defense, but his innocence disallowed for him to do that. Instead of conveying himself with words, he used his fists, and punched Claggart in the forehead, which ended up killing him. I do not sympathize with Billy because I simply could not understand the reason for his actions, he never explained why he did what he did, or speak up when he was given the chance. In the end, he resorted to violence and killed Claggart; an action taken that was completely unnecessary. Also, he had been warned numerous times that Claggart had no good intentions towards him, and instead of listening, he brushed it aside, he did not even consider the slightest possibility of there being truth in the warnings. In the end, he was betrayed by his own good nature and innocence. It really goes to show that people should take what has been said into consideration, instead of brushing it off as a joke right away.

http://allenglish.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/inoneear1.jpg

This picture shows words going in one ear and out the other.

7. Is justice served for Billy Budd?  Why or why not?  Who is to be thanked or blamed for the decisions of the court?

            In this case, justice is served, but just not for Billy. Although Billy is good natured and innocent, it did not stop him from killing Claggart, even if it was not intentional, his fists were the cause of death for a fellow shipmate. If one kills, one would have to receive some sort of punishment, although death by hanging is quite unsightly for a man such as Billy Budd, it still is a form of justice for the victim. No one is to be thanked or blamed for the courts decisions, the term “Justice is blind” is not just a saying; it really applies in this case. Although Captain Vere could have said something to the court to persuade them to pass a lighter sentence of the accused, he did not do anything. I think that Vere just wanted justice to be served for the dead, and it did not matter what would happen to Billy, and in the end, justice became the winner.

http://theoldgiftshop.com/images/figurines/MD7099.JPG

This picture shows that Lady Justice is blindfolded.

Comment on blog

Comment on blog

Billy Budd questions 2

6. What characteristic of Billy’s leads him to the forechains? Is this character a strength or a weakness? Explain. 

I think that the main thing that brought Billy to the forechains is his complete innocence and inability to say no. He is kind to everyone, so he never says no to what ever they request of him, and also, his innocence makes him seem like a complete push-over. This characteristic can be seen as a weakness but strength at the same time. On the Bellipotent, it plays out as a weakness since he gets pushed around by others, but on the Rights of Man, it is a strength because it makes the people around him love and care for him. This characteristic of his can be seen as a double bladed sword, where it can be used as an advantage, but when it isn’t used properly, it can cause harm to the owner.

https://vtunnel.com/index.php/1010110A/ec78708ffe01ceae1ac0646ed1d40e92dbe19206a1f28c7b2502d027c5a80d0e4083c187f15f9898872e850013a725304ed3e14d1cf45d76dd005b0f1ef76065a7012c125777798777f3a5aa173c664e9c6e4ef80a6d18406

A double bladed sword, where if it is not used correctly, it could hurt the owner as well.

4. What is Dansker’s function and purpose in the story?  What is Billy Budd’s response to his suggestion about Claggart?

Dansker, a rather elderly fellow on the Bellipotent as a mastman, is more like a father to Billy than a shipmate. In this story, he functions as Moses does in the Bible, he is the man who helps and guides Billy in his times of need and when he is troubled. Billy is puzzled after hearing the possibility of Claggart disliking him from Dansker, and is left to ponder on the fact that he might have fallen out of favor with Claggart since he feels that Claggart has only talked positively about him so far.

http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://www.shadowandact.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/moses-parting-red-sea1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.shadowandact.com/%3Fp%3D11349&usg=__mN45hz6_KSsKNUdAgPBJvId6fMo=&h=306&w=760&sz=75&hl=en&start=0&sig2=tpJwOLzqkPbeZb7aitH-yA&zoom=1&tbnid=ltRNtyr9sJlABM:&tbnh=74&tbnw=185&ei=X6OXTNG7NIv0swO2ovjACg&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmoses%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1024%26bih%3D611%26tbs%3Disch:10%2C17&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=84&vpy=365&dur=1132&hovh=142&hovw=354&tx=184&ty=122&oei=X6OXTNG7NIv0swO2ovjACg&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=19&ved=1t:429,r:13,s:0&biw=1024&bih=611

A picture of Moses, the man who guides his people who are “lost” to salvation.

Personal Response

Personal Response
English 20
Daniel Lin

Victorian literature, a form of writing that emerged during the early seventeenth century, known today as the Victorian era. Originally, these pieces of literature portrayed difficult lives in which hard work, perseverance, love and good luck triumph in the end, where the virtuous are rewarded and wrongdoers punished. However, as the century progressed, the basis of Victorian literature swayed from its original path and became much more complex. The Lady of Shalott portrays the ideal roles of what men and women in that era. It also conveys what romance would have been in the times of Victoria’s reign. Mainly, it informs that one should not attempt to defy fate, and any attempts to do so would result in dire consequences. Such a masterpiece illustrates the environment in which people lived during the Victorian age, as well as the mindsets of people at the time.

During Victorian times many pieces of poetry were written with romanticism as their main themes. They speak of beauty, emotions, utopian visions, and the focus of “self”. One of such, would be, “The Lady of Shalott”. This poem tells a tale about a beautiful lady who lives in a tower overseeing Camelot. She can never look directly out of her window, or a curse will befall on her, so she sits in her tower forever weaving a tapestry of the scenery she sees from her mirror. One day, a valiant knight known as Sir Lancelot passes by, clad in shining armor, catches Lady of Shallots’ eyes, and compels her to look out of her window. Thus far, one would be able to say that during Victorian times, the ideal woman would be a beautiful young damsel in distress, weaving, or doing more housework than anyone would be able to handle, to wait for the ideal man; a heroic knight to save her from her ordeal.

Although one cannot obtain factual evidence of what exactly Victorian literature was meant to portray, but judging from this passage, one can assume that during the 1800s, an ideal portrait of romance would be filled with a beautiful landscape in the background, and in the foreground. Along with this, there would be a stunning knight in shining armor rescuing a sweet, gentle lady that has been held captive by someone or something of incredible evil. A thing such as this could be thought of as romantic propaganda, but there really isn’t much evidence from this poem of what romantic propaganda was like in such times. It would most likely the case that, it is every lady’s dream to be saved by a gallant knight clad in shining armor and fall in love and live happily ever after.

It wasn’t The Lady of Shalott’s destiny to live happily ever after with the one she fell in love with. It was, however, to look outside her window and have the curse of death befall her. After she knew that the curse was upon her, she quickly got into a small boat with letter in hand, and drifted off to Camelot in the last moments of her life. The message here from the author, I believe, would be that during such times, women would be forever bound by a curse placed upon them by the society they lived in. Whether it would be the inability to go to school, or unable to work and make a living by themselves, they would make futile attempts to break off these chains. However, no matter how hard they tried, they could never break off these chains of fate put on them by society, and if they were able to, dire consequences would come to pass, and they would be the examples of any other woman that is to follow in her footsteps. Similar to The Lady of Shallot she tried to break her chains, but it merely resulted in her death.

From this poem, we are able to have a better understanding of past ideals, and how they affected the lives and thoughts of people who lived in the seventeenth century. It has taught us of the ideal roles of men and women, that almost every person has strived to be. The Lady of Shalott also painted a portrait of romantic themes, of what would have been then, and finally, from this poem, we learned that for people to go against the will of society, back then, was the same as going against fate, which would result in disastrous consequences. Overall, this piece of poetry has brought us an image of what life was like back then and how people were thinking in an era we would never be able to directly ask questions of.

http://farxodoremptyjournal.blogspot.com/2010/09/response-1.html?showComment=1284405415713#c8614557469835639212

http://farxodoremptyjournal.blogspot.com/2010/09/response-1.html?showComment=1284405415713#c8614557469835639212

Billy Budd questions

4. Discuss the possible significance of moving from a merchant ship (Rights of Man) to a war ship (Bellipotent). What might Melville be suggesting with this transition?


I would think that Melville is trying to say, life is never static, you can never live your life at one location until you die. The world is changing, and as it changes, so do the people that live in it. I think that the transition from the Rights of Man to the Bellipotent means that, Billy is leaving his old life behind and starting anew, he is changing from one "profession" to another, and his carefree attitude is helping him with this transition and making it easier for him than it would for others. It could also mean that Billy is a person that won't resist what life throws his way and goes with the flow. Also, "Rights of Man" is the French declaration of freedom (from Louis XVI) while Bellipotent means "good at war", it could also mean that Billy, someone who once lived a carefree life, has now become a machine for war, and has been transformed into an evil thing for massacre.


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju1QNJafqrNP3wSJ1iPzZqywEHkvGv6rgwWl_eCnRvDQIXgmCCfyOyiLOzOqbsdwTYn9zxsgfGo0ESSAzJgSul5BhnIuOETWc4v-91D24xNLzLOeerK4GP41J6KVaR_q7agyUOuzQ5yzE/s400/stormsea.jpg


This picture shows a ship being swept by giant waves without the slightest protest.

Billy Budd questions

2. Examine the incident between the Red Whiskers and Billy. What is this incident meant to do? Does it suggest comething about Billy's character or just the Red Whiskers's.


This incident was meant to show that Billy Budd is a person that doesn't like to be bothered. He won't resort to violence if the other party isn't the first to make a move. It suggests that Billy, although seems like a harmless and sweet little creature, can pack quite a big punch if aggravated, and that he can easy adapt to his surroundings. This incident also suggests that Red Whiskers's character can seem quite mean and act like somewhat like a bully, but he can also be a really nice person. For example, after the incident, Red Whiskers would "love" him just as much as the ships crew and would be extremely nice to Billy from then on. It seems like that these characters have dual personalities (not to the extreme), and have both light and dark sides of themselves.


http://www.instablogsimages.com/images/2009/10/20/masks_LLDPf_26050.gif


The photo shows two masks, one is smiling and the other frowning, it represents a single entity with two completely different expressions (personalities).

English 20 Goals

1. Get better at essay writing and writing in general

2. Get 90% or higher in the course

Test